Apple iPhone 14 Pro Camera test | DXOMARK - Chuyên Trang Chia Sẻ Kiến Thức Thời Trang Mới Nhất

We put the Apple iPhone 14 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

Primary: 48MP sensor, 24 mm equivalent f/1.78 -aperture lens, second generation sensor-shift OIS, Dual Pixel AF
Ultra-wide: 12MP sensor, 13mm equivalent f/2.2-aperture lens, Dual Pixel AF
Tele: 12MP sensor, 77 mm equivalent f/2.8-aperture lens, OIS
HDR video recording with Dolby Vision
A16 Bionic chipset

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

146

camera

143

photo
Exposure

111

117

Color

119

Best

Autofocus

112

116

Texture

111

114

Noise

116

Artifacts

bokeh
Bokeh

Best

preview
Preview

Best

139

zoom
Tele

103

116

Wide

100

117

149

video
Exposure

115

Best

Color

117

Best

Autofocus

117

Best

Texture

113

115

Noise

117

118

Artifacts

Stabilization

117

Best

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 168

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 157

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 127

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 143

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

5th

Position in Global Ranking

1. Honor Magic5 Pro

152

2. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

149

3. Google Pixel 7 Pro

147

3. Honor Magic4 Ultimate

147

5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

146

5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

146

7. Huawei P50 Pro

143

8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

141

8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

141

8. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

141

11. Google Pixel 7

140

11. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

140

11. Vivo X90 Pro+

140

14. Huawei Mate 40 Pro+

139

15. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

137

16. Vivo X90 Pro

136

16. Xiaomi 13 Pro

136

16. Xiaomi 12S Ultra

136

19. Huawei Mate 40 Pro

135

19. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

135

19. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)

135

22. Google Pixel 6 Pro

134

22. Vivo X70 Pro+

134

24. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

133

24. Apple iPhone 14

133

24. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

133

24. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)

133

28. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

131

28. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

131

30. Oppo Find X5 Pro

130

30. Xiaomi 13

130

32. Huawei P40 Pro

129

32. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra

129

32. Xiaomi 12T Pro

129

32. Xiaomi 12 Pro

129

36. Oppo Find X3 Pro

128

37. Apple iPhone 12 Pro

127

37. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders

127

39. Google Pixel 6

126

39. Honor Magic4 Pro

126

39. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)

126

39. Vivo X60 Pro+

126

43. Apple iPhone 13 mini

125

43. Apple iPhone 13

125

43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

125

43. Vivo X50 Pro+

125

47. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

124

47. Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro

124

49. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

122

49. Google Pixel 6a

122

49. OnePlus 10 Pro

122

49. OnePlus 9 Pro

122

53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

120

53. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

120

55. Sony Xperia 5 IV

119

56. Sony Xperia 1 IV

118

57. Apple iPhone 12

117

57. Apple iPhone 12 mini

117

57. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

117

57. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

117

57. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

117

62. Apple iPhone 11

116

62. Asus Zenfone 8

116

62. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

116

65. Honor 70

115

65. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)

115

65. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

115

65. Xiaomi 12T

115

69. Nothing Phone(1)

114

69. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

114

69. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

114

69. Oppo Find X5

114

69. Oppo Find N2 Flip

114

74. OnePlus 8 Pro

113

74. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G

113

74. Xiaomi 12

113

77. Oppo Reno8 5G

112

77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

112

79. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G

111

79. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)

111

79. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

111

82. Google Pixel 5

109

82. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

109

84. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)

108

84. Xiaomi 11T Pro

108

86. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

107

87. Oppo Find X3 Neo

106

88. Sony Xperia 1 III

105

89. Huawei P40

102

90. Black Shark 5 Pro

101

90. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

101

92. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

100

92. Google Pixel 4a

100

94. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra

95. Oppo Find X5 Lite

96. Oppo Reno4 5G

97. Oppo A94 5G

97. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

99. Samsung Galaxy A72

99. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

101. Oppo Reno6 5G

102. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

102. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

104. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

105. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

106. Vivo Y76 5G

107. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

108. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

109. Realme 9i 5G

110. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

111. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

112. Fairphone 4

112. Oppo A78 5G

114. Motorola Moto G62 5G

115. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

116. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

117. Sony Xperia 10 IV

118. Honor X7

118. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

120. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

121. Oppo A77 5G

122. Honor X8 5G

123. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

124. Crosscall Action-X5

125. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

126. Crosscall Core-Z5

127. Oppo A57

127. Oppo A16s 5G

5th

Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking

1. Honor Magic5 Pro

152

2. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

149

3. Google Pixel 7 Pro

147

3. Honor Magic4 Ultimate

147

5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

146

5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

146

7. Huawei P50 Pro

143

8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

141

8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

141

8. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

141

11. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

140

11. Vivo X90 Pro+

140

13. Huawei Mate 40 Pro+

139

14. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

137

15. Vivo X90 Pro

136

15. Xiaomi 13 Pro

136

15. Xiaomi 12S Ultra

136

18. Huawei Mate 40 Pro

135

18. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

135

18. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)

135

21. Google Pixel 6 Pro

134

21. Vivo X70 Pro+

134

23. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

133

23. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

133

25. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

131

25. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

131

27. Oppo Find X5 Pro

130

28. Huawei P40 Pro

129

28. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra

129

28. Xiaomi 12 Pro

129

31. Oppo Find X3 Pro

128

32. Apple iPhone 12 Pro

127

32. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders

127

34. Honor Magic4 Pro

126

34. Vivo X60 Pro+

126

36. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

125

36. Vivo X50 Pro+

125

38. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

124

38. Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro

124

40. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

122

40. OnePlus 10 Pro

122

40. OnePlus 9 Pro

122

43. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

120

44. Sony Xperia 5 IV

119

45. Sony Xperia 1 IV

118

46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

117

47. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)

115

47. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

115

49. Oppo Find X5

114

49. Oppo Find N2 Flip

114

51. OnePlus 8 Pro

113

52. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

112

53. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G

111

53. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)

111

55. Sony Xperia 1 III

105

Pros

Pleasant and vivid color in both photo and video, accurate skin tones
Wide dynamic range in both photo and video, excellent contrast
High level of detail both in photo and video
Excellent autofocus both for photo and video
Pleasant simulated bokeh effect with very good details on faces
High quality continuous photo and video zoom at close and medium range
Excellent video stablilization

Cons

Occasional highlight clipping in skies
Luminance noise in indoor photos
Occasional white balance casts on photos taken in mixed lighting
Ringing around subjects in photos and videos

With a DXOMARK Camera score of 146, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro is the best iPhone we have tested to date and places itself among the very best phones in our ranking. It is extremely reliable, producing repeatable image and video results in all conditions, and shines particularly in portrait photography and videography, thanks to high levels of detail and very nice skin tone rendering, as well as excellent autofocus tracking in video.

While — at least on paper — the 14 Pro´s camera hardware might not look quite as impressive as the components of some competitors, such as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or Honor Magic4 Ultimate, it’s fair to say the Apple engineers have managed to squeeze a lot of image quality and performance out of it. This is the first Apple device with a Quad-Bayer image sensor, and it’s been used not only to improve image quality at the primary camera’s nominal focal length, but also to provide high-quality seamless zooming up to a 3x tele factor where the dedicated tele kicks in. The iPhone 14 Pro also takes over as the best video recording phone from its iPhone 13 Pro predecessors. In combination with the other improvements, this makes it one of the currently very best options for mobile image makers.

Please note that throughout this article we compare the Apple iPhone 14 Pro to both the iPhone 13 Pro and 13 Pro Max, which achieved identical results in last year’s tests.

Friends & Family

Friends & Family is a new use case score, introduced with the latest version 5 of the DXOMARK Camera test protocol. It has been designed to represent the test device’s ability to capture technically good photos and videos in the most common consumer use cases (family, friends, pets). It is computed from data recorded during those Photo, Zoom and Video tests that include people and moving subjects, a total of 60+ scenes both in the lab and real-life scenes with models.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro — pleasant and vivid colors that are great for portrait photography

The iPhone 14 Pro achieves a Friends and Family score of 140, the high for this category. It is a great device for taking pictures of activities with friends and family. Zero shutter lag being available in most conditions means that the camera is capable of capturing the decisive moment. It is also very good at minimizing motion blur on moving subjects and offers excellent skin tone rendering as well as contrast on faces. In addition, the iPhone 14 Pro does a great job at tracking people in video mode. It´s also the best device for Bokeh we have tested to date, allowing you to shoot portraits of your loved ones that feature a natural-looking background blur, very close to what you would expect from a DSLR and fast lens.

Low Light

Like Friends and Family, Low light is a new score introduced with the latest update of the Camera test protocol. It is designed to represent a device’s ability to capture technically good photos and videos in the most challenging light conditions. It is computed from data recorded during those Photo, Zoom and Video tests that are undertaken at light levels below 50 lux.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – slight underexposure, noise, neutral white balance, slight lack of colors

The iPhone 14 Pro achieves a score of 113 for the Low Light use case, but this is not where the new iPhone 14 Pro shines the most. Even when the camera exposes the scene well (night mode is triggered automatically) shadow clipping can occur, fine detail is lost and some grain can be noticeable.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us on how to receive a full report.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Camera Scores vs Ultra-Premium

This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

143

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

154

Honor Magic5 Pro

About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Learn more about how we test camera

In terms of still image quality, the iPhone 14 Pro is quite close to last year’s 13 Pro Max, especially in bright light and landscape shots. However, it does come with some notable improvements, particularly in more challenging light conditions and high-contrast scenes. For example, in backlit scenes improvements are noticeable for all attributes. In the color category, skin tones are more accurate in difficult conditions. In terms of exposure and contrast, the new model is less affected by a loss of contrast and an increase in detail is very noticeable on faces in portrait scenes.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Photo scores vs Ultra-Premium

The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera’s main strengths and weaknesses.

The iPhone 14 Pro offers full resolution 48MP RAW capture, a feature that is likely to please enthusiast photographers. However, we do not evaluate this mode as all our testing is done using the camera app’s default mode. All HEIC files captured have been converted to JPG format for this review.

Close-Up

Close-up is the third new use case score introduced with DXOMARK Camera version 5. It evaluates the camera’s ability to capture detail at subject distances below 10cm and magnifications as close possible to 1:1.

The iPhone 14 Pro offers excellent close-up capabilities. Detail is excellent, especially at close subject distances. Macro mode does not have to be activated. A close subject distance is detected automatically, making for a seamless user experience. For macro mode, the device switches to its ultra-wide camera which is capable of focusing very closely and provides great detail at the center of the frame.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – high level of detail, slight noise

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – slightly less detail, noise

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) – loss of fine detail, slight noise

Exposure

111

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

117

Honor Magic5 Pro

Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.

The 14 Pro delivers good subject exposure in all conditions, with improved contrast over the 13 Pro. Dynamic range on the other hand is still slightly limited when compared to the best in class, for example the Honor Magic4 Ultimate. In low light, our testers also observed some shadow clipping.

In this difficult backlit scene, the iPhone 14 Pro manages accurate target exposure and a fairly wide dynamic range. Contrast is very good on both faces as well. On the 13 Pro Max, we can see some limitations in terms of noise, detail, and color rendering on the subjects. The Honor Magic4 Ultimate offers a wide dynamic range with better highlight retention, but strong contrast issues are noticeable on faces, especially dark skin tones.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – good contrast on faces, slight highlight clipping

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – contrast issue especially on left face, inaccurate skin tones, noise and lack of detail on faces, slight highlight clipping

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – slight contrast issues on both faces and skin tone inaccuracies on dark skin, no highlight clipping

The improvements in terms of contrast are also noticeable in this indoor scene.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – accurate face exposure and great contrast, highlight clipping

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – accurate face exposure, slight contrast issues, highlight clipping

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – accurate face exposure, slight flare and tone compression, less highlight clipping

In low light, the latest iPhone captures nice exposures but compared to the best devices, dynamic range is slightly more limited, in both the highlight and shadow areas of the frame.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – limited dynamic range in highlights and shadows

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – limited dynamic range in highlights and shadows

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – wide dynamic range

Color

119

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best

Color is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but we respect a manufacturer’s choice of color signature.

White balance is generally accurate. In low light, an acceptably warm cast is in line with user preferences. Compared to the iPhone 13 Pro Max, color rendering has been improved, especially in terms of skin tones, which are now more accurate. Portraits are generally very nice with some of the best skin tones we have seen.

Apple iPhone 14 pro – nice color

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – slightly cold color cast

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – slight lack of saturation

The excellent and improved skin tone rendering is also visible in this sample.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – natural skin tones

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – slightly reddish skin tones

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – slightly inaccurate skin tones

Color is not perfect, though. When indoor lighting is mixed with daylight, images often show a yellow or slightly green color cast – in general within acceptable limits. On some occasions, like in the scene below, this can create a nicer color response than on the competitors.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – yellow-green cast

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – yellow cast

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) – neutral white balance

Autofocus

112

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

116

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called ‘zero shutter lag’ capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

The autofocus is fast, accurate, and repeatable. The zero shutter lag technology does a good job in all conditions, even challenging scenes, allowing for instant capture of the decisive moment. The phone’s fairly large image sensor means that the depth of field is pretty shallow for a smartphone. This can make for a nice natural bokeh effect in close-up shots but also means that in group shots people in the background might be out of focus.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 20Lux Δ7EV Tungsten Handheld

This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 20Lux with Tungsten illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set up to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and a 18% reflective gray patch is 7, which we denote by a Exposure Value difference of 7. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.

One of the purposes of this scene is to test the autofocus and shutter lag. The shutter button is pressed at exactly the moment the subject passes through the door frame. The position of the subject in the captured image illustrates the shutter lag.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – excellent timing, image is captured at the intended moment

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – excellent timing.

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra – noticeable delay, subject has already passed through the door and is closer to the camera

This double portrait illustrates the differences between the comparison devices in terms of depth of field.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – depth of field

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – background face out of focus

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, depth of field

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – some loss of detail on background face

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – depth of field

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – good detail on background face

Texture

111

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

114

Honor Magic5 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

With the new model, Apple has made significant improvements in terms of detail. This is visible in lab measurements as well as in portrait images like the one below. This is one of the key strengths of the iPhone 14 Pro.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Accurate target exposure. Visible clipping and hue shifts in the sky.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Good details on face on backlit scenes.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – Accurate target exposure. Visible clipping and hue shifts in the sky.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – Loss details on subject in backlit scenes.

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos) – Slight underexposure. slight clipping in the sky.

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos) – Slight loss of detail in backlit scenes.

Improvements over last year’s model are also noticeable in low light, but the Honor Magic4 Ultimate remains ahead of the iPhone in terms of detail in those conditions.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro, low light detail

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – low noise, some loss of fine detail

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, low light detail

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – strong noise, loss of detail on face

Honor Magic4 Ultimate, low light detail

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – low noise, good detail

For the latest version of our Camera test protocol, we have developed a new metric to evaluate motion blur. This metric reveals the test devices’ ability to capture moving subjects with good detail and evaluates how they manage motion blur. The measurement quantifies the perception of blur from a moving subject in the scene (the lower the better). It has a significant impact on the new Friends and Family score.

From 20 lux (low light) to 1000 lux (outdoor conditions) the Apple iPhone 14 Pro and the 13 Pro Max perform both very well compared to the competitors.
For 5 Lux and below, both iPhones change strategy and blur becomes more visible on moving subjects (lower values mean less visible motion blur).

The motion blur measurements are confirmed by real-life scenes. The iPhone 14 Pro does well at capturing moving subjects from bright light down to low light conditions.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – motion blur

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – slight motion blur

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – motion blur

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – strong motion blur

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) – motion blur

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) – strong motion blur

Noise

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

116

Honor Magic5 Pro

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition

This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

In bright light, especially in backlit scenes, the iPhone 14 Pro does well at controlling subject noise. In indoor scenes, such as the one below, noise is often noticeable in areas of plain color, sometimes more so than on the iPhone 13 Pro Max. Thanks to the increased detail, the texture/noise trade-off has overall improved on the new model but there are no improvements in terms of noise score. It appears the larger surface area of the new image sensor is mainly used to produce more detail while keeping noise at a similar level as before.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – indoor noise

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – some noise

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – indoor noise

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – slight noise

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – indoor noise

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – no noise

Under indoor conditions and in low light or night shots, noise is often visible on moving elements in the scene.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – night portrait

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – noise on moving elements and background

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – night portrait

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – noise on moving elements and background

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) – night portrait

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) – well-controlled noise on moving elements

Artifacts

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Google Pixel 6

The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among others type of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main photo artifacts penalties

Despite overall excellent image quality our testers still observed some minor processing artifacts, including ringing, ghosting and color quantization.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro, artifacts

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – strong ringing around subject

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, artifacts

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – ringing around subject

Honor Magic4 Ultimate, artifacts

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – very slight ringing around subject

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – very visible cyan hue shift in the sky

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – very visible cyan hue shift in the sky

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – barely visible hue shift

Bokeh

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best

Bokeh is tested in one dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce portrait photography comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

Bokeh images show a high level of detail on faces, and the iPhone 14 Pro now comes with foreground blur for a more realistic overall effect, something that previous iPhone generations were lacking. Compared to the 13 Pro Max, segmentation artifacts are less visible as well.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro –
foreground blur as expected, good blur transition through planes, good detail on face

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max –
no blur on foreground, good blur transition and natural bokeh effect

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – slight loss of detail on subject, good blur transition and natural bokeh effect, widest simulated aperture in this comparison

Preview

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app’s preview of the image, with particular attention paid to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. Also evaluated is the smoothness of the exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom factor available. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

The iPhone 14 Pro achieves a new top score for Preview, with a preview image that is even closer to the final capture than before. This is especially true for the bokeh effect in portrait mode. In addition, the switch between camera modules when pinch-zooming or using the on-screen buttons is smooth.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro, bokeh mode capture

Apple iPhone 14 Pro, preview – well-defined blur in bokeh mode preview

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon), bokeh mode capture

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon), preview – multiple blur-differences compared to capture

Zoom

139

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

156

Honor Magic5 Pro

About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

Learn more about how we test camera

The iPhone 14 Pro comes with a dedicated 3x tele camera — same as last year — but in addition, it is making use of the Quad-Bayer sensor in the main camera for zooming. At a 1x zoom factor the camera works in standard pixel binning mode. Once you start zooming in, it switches to full-resolution mode, which allows for high-quality digital zooming and cropping until the tele camera takes over, providing a seamless zoom experience along the tele zoom range. The iPhone also does well for video zoom and comes with an improved ultra-wide camera with a larger image sensor.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Zoom Scores vs Ultra-Premium

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.

Video Zoom

With the latest version 5 of our Camera test protocol, we introduced zoom testing for video. Several image quality attributes are measured for video zoom, and we include a detail preservation metric for several video zoom distances in our test results.

This graph shows the level of detail in bright light when using zoom-in video mode. The level of detail is measured at multiple focal lengths, including those that can directly be chosen via a UI button. The new iPhone offers consistently good detail from ultra-wide (15mm/0.5x) to medium range (3x) where the camera switches from the main to the dedicated tele module.

Wide

100

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

117

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 mm to 20 mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Pictures below are an extract of tested scenes.

When shooting with the 14 Pro’s ultra-wide camera, the level of captured detail is pretty high at the widest focal length setting. However, when zooming to just before the switch to the main camera, the iPhone 14 Pro shows a stronger loss of detail than the other best-in-class devices such as the Honor Magic4 Ultimate. The Magic4 Ultimate is capable of maintaining very good detail at the center of the frame at all ultra-wide focal length settings from 16-21mm.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro, ultra-wide 18mm

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – loss of fine detail at the center of the frame

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, ultra-wide 18mm

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – loss of detail

Honor Magic4 Ultimate, ultra-wide 18mm

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – excellent detail at center, strong loss of detail at the edges

Tele

103

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

116

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

When shooting at tele zoom settings the new flagship iPhone delivers good detail at close and medium range settings. However, detail drops somewhat off at long range.

5 lux
20 lux
100 lux
1000 lux

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions.The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality.Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length

Compared to the iPhone 13 Pro Max, the 14 Pro tele mode has improved significantly at a zoom setting of around 2x, just before the tele module activates. As you can see in the detail preservation graph above, the new model does not have the same drop in detail around 2x as its predecessor, and the level of captured detail is pretty consistent across close and medium range. This is true for all light conditions.

Compared to the Honor Magic4 Ultimate, the level of detail at the center of the frame is generally lower, but there is no significant drop of sharpness towards the edges. The Honor offers noticeably better detail at the center, but towards the edges detail is much lower.

Apple iPhone14 Pro, close range tele

Apple iPhone14 Pro – slight loss of detail, consistent level of detail across the frame

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, close range tele

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – loss of detail, consistent level of detail across the frame

Honor Magic4 Ultimate, close range tele

Honor Magic4 Ultimate – high level of detail, strong loss of detail towards the edges

Some improvements over the 13 Pro Max are also noticeable at long range (>150mm) but, like at close and medium range, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate still offers the best detail and texture/noise trade-off.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro, long range tele (200mm)

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – slight loss of detail

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, long range tele (200mm)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – loss of detail

Honor Magic4 Ultimate, long range tele (200mm)

Honor Magic4 Ultimate, high level of detail

Video

149

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best

About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Learn more about how we test camera

The Apple iPhone 14 Pro achieves a new top score for video and has improved over the iPhone 13 Pro generation in all video attributes. Video tests were undertaken at 4K resolution and 30 frames per second, with Dolby Vision activated.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Video scores vs Ultra-Premium

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

115

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.

The new iPhone takes over the top score for video exposure from its predecessor, offering a wide dynamic range and smooth exposure transition in most conditions. Like previous iPhones, the 14 Pro comes with HDR format video that offers high contrast capabilities that allow for a more natural rendering of HDR scenes than most competitors. Excellent tuning means the iPhone shines in terms of exposure, including highlight and shadow detail retention, as well as contrast across the entire tonal range.

In this HDR format video, you can see the iPhone’s high contrast level in the sky. In this area, the tonal transitions are more natural than on the competition, and detail is preserved even in both the brightest and darkest parts of the scene. In comparison, the Honor suffers from highlight clipping and tone compression. Please note: YouTube only displays the original HDR rendering if videos are watched on a compatible HDR screen. Otherwise, a compressed SDR video is displayed.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro –
high contrast across entire tonal range with HDR format

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – high contrast across entire tonal range with HDR format

Honor Magic4 Ultimate –
tone compression in highlights, slight shadow clipping

Exposure is very close to the iPhone 13 Pro Max. Both achieve good target exposure, with a wide dynamic range and high contrast across the entire tonal range. In comparison, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate does worse in terms of contrast and dynamic range, with more highlight and shadow clipping.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro –
wide dynamic range, very slight highlight clipping , good shadow detail

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – wide dynamic range , very slight highlight clipping, fairly good shadow detail

Honor Magic4 Ultimate –
highlight clipping, loss of shadow detail

Color

117

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best

Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

In bright light, white balance is neutral, and transitions in changing light conditions are smooth. Compared to the 13 Pro Max, the new model is slightly improved.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – accurate skin tones, pleasant colors

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – accurate skin tones, pleasant colors

Honor Magic4 Ultimate –
fairly accurate skin tones, pleasant colors

The iPhone 14 Pro also performs very well for color in low light. Being slightly warm, white balance matches user preferences in these lighting conditions perfectly. Skin tones are generally fairly accurate, and color rendering is pleasant, even in difficult light.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro –
pleasant white balance and natural skin tones

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max –
pleasant white balance and natural skin tones.

Honor Magic4 Ultimate –
oversaturated colors resulting in slightly unnatural skin tones

Autofocus

117

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best

Video autofocus offers excellent tracking capabilities, following faces in the frame very well. Focus transitions are smooth from the closest focus distance to infinity.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro – effective autofocus tracking, smooth focus transitions

Texture

113

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

115

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural videos recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of details in the bright and areas as well as in the dark. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

The DMC graph shows detail measurements for the 14 Pro that are very close to the previous iPhone generation in bright light and indoors, with a slight improvement at low light levels around 5 lux. Details are preserved well across the entire tonal range, from shadows to highlights.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro –
high level of detail, even in the shadows

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max –
high level of detail, even in the shadows

Honor Magic4 Ultimate –
slight loss of detail

Noise

117

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

118

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

Spatial Noise
Temporal Noise

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

Noise management is one of the 14 Pro’s biggest strengths. Both temporal and spatial noise are well under control in almost all light conditions. In the shadows, our testers notice some improvement over the 13 Pro Max, and overall, the 14 Pro’s texture/noise trade-off is excellent and among the best we have seen.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro –
very well-controlled noise on desk

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max –
well-controlled noise on desk

Honor Magic4 Ultimate –
noise on desk

Stabilization

117

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jello artifacts and residual motion blur on walk and run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

Camera motion is dealt with very well, and the 14 Pro comes with one of the best video stabilization systems we have tested to date. Both high- and low- frequency motion is compensated for well, from “normal” handheld shooting to running while recording.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro –
slight high-frequency residual motion when walking during recording, well-controlled with strong motion (running at the end of this clip)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max –
slight high-frequency residual motion when walking during recording, well-controlled with strong motion (running at the end of this clip)

Honor Magic4 Ultimate –
slight high-frequency residual motion when walking during recording, well-controlled with strong motion (running at the end of this clip)

Artifacts

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

The iPhone suffers mostly from standard video artifacts, such as maze, aliasing or flare. A 30/60 fps variable frame-rate, which is available on many other top-end smartphone cameras, would have been useful for a good noise/detail trade-off in low light and for avoiding judder effects when panning the camera in bright conditions.

Main video artifacts penalties