reviews of 106 DOMINANT, a CHANEL ROUGE COCO FLASH Hydrating Vibrant Shi…

Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews
for this purple brown hued
lipstick
so far:
Considering the application category a rating of five suggests responses to “how did this product apply?” heavily lean glides. Looking at review rankings for the moisturizing category the current four is a sign that evaluating “how moisturizing is this product?” generally favor hydrating. Feedback for the long-wearing category an average total of one suggests reviewers replies to “how long-wearing is this product?” tended towards disappears quickly. Reviewing the colour category the rating of four suggests users & critics considering the question “does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?” mildly lean true to colour. On the pigmentation category the current rating of one indicates in response to the “how pigmented is this product?” generally indicate sheer.

at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.

without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.

as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.

an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.

we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .