reviews of 74 FLASH, a CHANEL ROUGE COCO FLASH Hydrating Vibrant Shine L…

Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews
for this salmon pink hued
lipstick
so far:
In the application category an average of five is a sign that when asked “how did this product apply?” primarily favor glides. Feedback for the moisturizing category the current rating of four suggests users & critics replies to “how moisturizing is this product?” mainly favor hydrating. On the long-wearing category the current one indicates evaluating “how long-wearing is this product?” usually indicate disappears quickly. Considering the colour category the rating of four suggests responses to “does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?” mildly indicate true to colour. Looking at review rankings for the pigmentation category an average total of one suggests reviewers considering the question “how pigmented is this product?” mostly responded sheer.

at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.

without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.

as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.

an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.

we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .