The Importance of the Teaching Profession, Teacher Quality, Teaching Quality, and Teacher Leadership – Issuu

Fifteen years ago, the adage “the quality of an education system cannot exceed the quality of its teachers” (Barber & Mourshed, 2007, p.13) was promoted and has since become well known. While that adage continues to be used, we offer four important additional points in Box 1. We discuss each of these points below.

Box 1. The Development of High-Quality Education Systems: Teacher Quality, Teaching Quality, and Teacher Leadership

• Developing teacher quality and teaching quality is essential for high quality education systems; • Teaching quality is influenced by teachers’ working context and conditions within their education system, school and classroom; • “The quality of an education system cannot exceed the extend to which it supports, sustains and invests in the status of its teachers” (Thompson, 2021, P. 114); • Valuing teacher leadership for educational change and improvement is vital for creating and sustaining high-quality education systems.

Developing Teacher Quality and Teaching Quality is Essential for High Quality Education Systems

Both teacher quality – the professional – and teaching quality – teachers’ dayto-day practices in specific contexts – matter. Based on analyses of education systems that are higher performing in terms of student achievement and more equitable in their student outcomes, Darling-Hammond et al. (2017) identified the importance of education systems valuing and developing both teacher quality and teaching quality (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Teacher Quality and Teaching Quality (Adapted from Darling-Hammond et al., 2017, pp.17-18)

The importance of teacher quality, teaching quality, and support for the status of the teaching profession is integral to Education International and UNESCO’s Global Framework of Professional Teaching Standards (2019). As outlined in Figure 2, the three main domains of the Global Framework of Professional Teaching Standards are: teaching knowledge and understanding, teaching practice, and teaching relations. As we have previously proposed: “Teaching is the knowledge profession (Campbell 2016) and valuing and advancing teachers’ existing knowledge and providing opportunities to renew, expand and develop that knowledge is crucial.” (Campbell, 2018, p. 76). Further, while the work of individual teachers matters, their work is influenced by, and must adapt to, the specific classroom and school context they are working in, including consideration of students’ needs, engagement with parents and caregivers, and relationships and collaboration with colleagues.

T h r e e D o m a i n s T e n S t a n d a r d s

I. Teaching

Knowledge and

Understanding

Practising teachers know and understand:

1How students learn, and the particular learning, social, and development needs of their students

2The content and related methodologies of the subject matter or content being taught

3Core research and analytical methods that apply in teaching, including with regard to student assessment

4Planning and preparation to meet the learning objectives held for students

II. Teaching Practice

Teachers’ practice consistently demonstrates:

III. Teaching Relations

Teachers’ professional relations include active participation in: 5

An appropriate range of teaching activities that reflect and align with both the nature of the subject content being taught, and the learning, support, and development needs of the students

6

7

8

9

Organisation and facilitation of students’ activities so that students are able to participate constructively, in a safe and cooperative manner

Assessment and analysis of student learning that informs the further preparation for, and implementation of required teaching and learning activity

Cooperative and collaborative professional processes that contribute to collegial development, and support student learning and development

Communications with parents, caregivers, and members of the community, as appropriate, to support the learning objectives of students, including formal and informal reporting

10 Continuous professional development to maintain currency of their professional knowledge and practice

Figure 2. Global Framework of Professional Teaching Standards (Education International & UNESCO, 2019, p. 6)

Teaching Quality is Influenced by Teachers’ Working Contexts and Conditions within their Education System, School, and Classroom

Teachers’ professional lives and work are influenced by a range of personal and professional factors, including the policies, culture, and working conditions of the education systems, schools, and classrooms they work in (Cordingley et al., 2019). The OECD (2021) combined and analysed data from the 2018 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), involving data “from more than 30 000 students and more than 15 000 teachers from more than 1 000 schools on four different continents” (OECD, 2021, p.3). In his forward to the report of this analysis, the OECD’s Director for the Directorate of Education and Skills, Andreas Schleicher, concluded:

So what have we learned? If there was only one conclusion to take away from this report, it is that what teachers do in and outside the classroom matters the

most – and the most directly – for the cognitive and social-emotional outcomes of the school’s students. Classroom practices that create opportunities to learn, teachers’ use of working time, as well as the well-being and job satisfaction of the teachers are among the most influential school factors. (OECD, 2021, p.4).

However, Andreas Schleicher continued to explain:

But this report does not only confirm the crucial role of teachers in young people’s development. It also sheds light on other actors. Students’ classmates and schoolmates, as well as the school’s culture and leadership (including the role parents play) are also found to matter a lot for student outcomes. (OECD, 2021, p.4).

As depicted in Figure 3, the OECD analyses indicates the importance of school leadership and school context in supporting teachers’ development, professional experiences, and work; and of teachers’ classroom practices in the context of their classrooms, students’ characteristics, and school culture.

The Teacher-led Learning Circles project focuses on engagement in professional development (top left quadrant) to develop teachers’ classroom practices for formative assessment (bottom right quadrant). However, these factors cannot be considered fully in isolation from the other school and teacher dimensions; for example, school leadership and school culture are central to supporting professional development and valuing formative assessment.

The Quality of an Education System Cannot Exceed the Extent to Which It Supports, Sustains, and Invests in the Status of Its Teachers

As David Edwards, General Secretary of Education International, has cautioned, quality education cannot be seen solely as the responsibility of the “heroic extra effort by teachers” (in Thompson, 2021, p. 17), especially in the context of the emergency and continuing responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Teachers and their teaching matter, and investment in the teaching profession and support to develop their professional work matters. Based on his analyses for Education International’s The Global Report on the Status of Teachers 2021, Thompson (2021, p.114) proposed it “is time to recalculate” the adage about education quality to become: “the quality of an education system cannot exceed the extent to which it supports, sustains, and invests in the status of its teachers.” We agree with this recalculation.

Education systems that invest in, value, support and develop a high-quality education profession tend to have higher student achievement and more equitable outcomes (Darling-Hammond et al., 2017; OECD, 2021). Thompson (2021) has developed the concept of “intelligent professionalism” to argue for a shift from professional autonomy being conceived as the downloading of government mandates and linked work intensification for educators to

an approach that “privileges the expertise in the profession itself” (p.5). This shift includes teachers having professional agency to develop and apply their professional knowledge and judgement within their work and teaching context. To achieve this, valuing and enabling teacher leadership, and investing in and supporting continuing professional development of teachers is essential.

Figure 3. Teacher and School Factors that Matter both for Student Academic Success and Social-emotional Development (OECD, 2021, p.23)

Valuing Teacher Leadership for Educational Change and Improvement is Vital for Creating and Sustaining High-quality Education Systems

Based on research concerning teachers’ professional identities and work, and education system contexts and performance, Cordingley et al. (2019, p.107) found:

It is notable that it is in the very high performing jurisdictions that teacher leadership has most prominence and where the development of teachers’ leadership skills is supported extensively and substantively… The authors believe that there is evidence here to suggest that focussing on teacher leadership and explicitly developing teachers’ leadership skills can pay

dividends in increasing education capacity and enhancing system vitality and that both unions and policy makers would be well advised to consider ways of promoting teacher leadership.

This emphasis on the importance of governments and teacher unions promoting and supporting teacher leadership is central to the work of Education International, and in development work to support teacher leadership, including the processes within the Teacher-led Learning Circles. For example, describing a previous joint project involving Education International and HertsCam, Bangs and Frost (2015, p. 93) explained:

…a key characteristic of the International Teacher Leadership (ITL) project’s view of distributed leadership is that all teachers are entitled, as professionals, to initiate and lead change, contribute to knowledge building and to have influence, both locally within their own schools, and more widely through collective action (Frost, 2011, 2014). It is essentially about voice, but not merely with teachers as the subject of consultation from above, rather it implies the right to set the agenda and to both create and validate solutions to educational problems.

In high-quality education systems, all teachers are considered to have the professional right and the capacity to exert leadership influence through their values, behaviours, relationships, practices, and impact. Teacher leadership is important for improving policy, practice, and educational outcomes. As Bangs and Frost (2015, p. 104) argued:

There is now abundant evidence that teachers are able to embrace an extended mode of professionality in which they are influential in matters of policy and practice. They can direct their own professional learning and support that of their colleagues. They can contribute to the development of policies on improving their own schools and the wider system. It is crucial to note, however, that this is not a matter merely of allowing this to happen, but one of positively enabling it. In such enablement, while school principals have the prime responsibility to create the conditions that favour teacher leadership, teacher unions can also have a significant role.

To achieve the features of high-quality education systems outlined in Box 1, valuing and supporting teacher leadership and ensuring teachers have opportunities to engage in professional development and continuing professional learning throughout their career are essential. We turn now to discuss the features of teacher leadership and of effective continuing professional development.