Top 11 quality of care assessment tools in 2023
Below are the best information and knowledge on the subject quality of care assessment tools compiled and compiled by our own team thoitrangredep:
Mục lục
1. Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools
Author: www.rand.org
Date Submitted: 10/10/2022 03:19 PM
Average star voting: 3 ⭐ ( 58369 reviews)
Summary:
Match with the search results: . They also cover a variety of modes of providing care, including history, physical examination, laboratory study, medication, and other interventions and contacts….. read more
2. Health Information Quality Assessment Tools
Author: apps.who.int
Date Submitted: 07/14/2022 02:07 PM
Average star voting: 3 ⭐ ( 38087 reviews)
Summary: A number of assessment methods and measurement tools have been proposed over the last twenty years that provide the general public and healthcare professionals with several options for assessing the quality of health information online.
Match with the search results: Assessment tool for hospital care: improving the quality of care for reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child and adolescent health in South-East Asia….. read more
3. Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi – BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Author: www.ahrq.gov
Date Submitted: 02/03/2019 01:09 AM
Average star voting: 3 ⭐ ( 39490 reviews)
Summary: In 2014 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a new tool to be used to assess the quality of care for mothers, newborns and children provided at healthcare facility level. This paper reports on the feasibility of using the tool, its limitations and strengths. Across 5 districts in Malawi, 35 healthcare facilities were assessed. The WHO tool includes checklists, interviews and observation of case management by which care is assessed against agreed standards using a Likert scale (1 lowest: not meeting standard, 5 highest: compliant with standard). Descriptive statistics were used to provide summary scores for each standard. A ‘dashboard’ system was developed to display the results. For maternal care three areas met standards; 1) supportive care for admitted patients (71% of healthcare facilities scored 4 or 5); 2) prevention and management of infections during pregnancy (71% scored 4 or 5); and 3) management of unsatisfactory progress of labour (84% scored 4 or 5). Availability of essential equipment and supplies was noted to be a critical barrier to achieving satisfactory standards of paediatric care (mean score; standard deviation: 2.9; SD 0.95) and child care (2.7; SD 1.1). Infection control is inadequate across all districts for maternal, newborn and paediatric care. Quality of care varies across districts with a mean (SD) score for all standards combined of 3 (SD 0.19) for the worst performing district and 4 (SD 0.27) for the best. The best performing district has an average score of 4 (SD 0.27). Hospitals had good scores for overall infrastructure, essential drugs, organisation of care and management of preterm labour. However, health centres were better at case management of HIV/AIDS patients and follow-up of sick children. There is a need to develop an expanded framework of standards which is inclusive of all areas of care. In addition, it is important to ensure structure, process and outcomes of health care are reflected.
Match with the search results: These interactive training tools teach strategies that health care organizations and clinical teams can use to ensure that people understand their alternatives, ……. read more
4. The Johns Hopkins Primary Care Policy Center – PCA Tools
Author: www.ahrq.gov
Date Submitted: 01/27/2019 07:58 AM
Average star voting: 5 ⭐ ( 45735 reviews)
Summary:
Match with the search results: Site Assessment Tools. TeamSTEPPS Long-Term Care Instructor Guide. The Long-Term Care version of TeamSTEPPS adapts the core concepts of the TeamSTEPPS program ……. read more
5. Assessing the Utility of a Quality-of-Care Assessment Tool Used in Assessing Comprehensive Care Services Provided by Community Health Workers in South Africa
Author: www.nhlbi.nih.gov
Date Submitted: 10/12/2021 11:15 AM
Average star voting: 4 ⭐ ( 31500 reviews)
Summary: Background Few studies exist on the tools for assessing quality-of-care of community health worker (CHW) who provide comprehensive care, and for available tools, evidence on the utility is scanty. We aimed to assess the utility components of a previously-reported quality-of-care assessment tool developed for summative assessment in South Africa. Methods In two provinces, we used ratings by 21 CHWs and 3 team leaders in two primary health care facilities per province regarding whether the tool covered everything that happens during their household visits and whether they were happy to be assessed using the tool (acceptability and face validity), to derive agreement index (≥85%, otherwise the tool had to be revised). A panel of six experts quantitatively validated 11 items of the tool (content validity). Content validity index (CVI), of individual items (I-CVI) or entire scale (S-CVI), should be >80% (excellent). For the inter-rater reliability (IRR), we determined agreement between paired observers’ assigned quality-of-care messages and communication scores during 18 CHW household visits (nine households per site). Bland and Altman plots and multilevel model analysis, for clustered data, were used to assess IRR. Results In all four CHW and team leader sites, agreement index was ≥85%, except for whether they were happy to be assessed using the tool, where it was <85% in one facility. The I-CVI of the 11 items in the tool ranged between 0.83 and 1.00. For the S-CVI, all six experts agreed on relevancy (universal agreement) in 8 of 11 items (0.72) whereas the average of I-CVIs, was 0.95. The Bland-Altman plot limit of agreements between paired observes were -0.18 to 0.44 and -0.30 to 0.44 (messages score); and -0.22 to 0.45 and -0.28 to 0.40 (communication score). Multilevel modelling revealed an estimated reliability of 0.77 (messages score) and 0.14 (communication score). Conclusion The quality-of-care assessment tool has a high face and content validity. IRR was substantial for quality-of-care messages but not for communication score. This suggests that the tool may only be useful in the formative assessment of CHWs. Such assessment can provide the basis for reflection and discussion on CHW performance and lead to change.
Match with the search results: In 2013, NHLBI developed a set of tailored quality assessment tools to assist reviewers in focusing on concepts that are key to a study’s internal validity….. read more
6. CARE Item Set and B-CARE | CMS
Author: gh.bmj.com
Date Submitted: 03/31/2022 07:57 AM
Average star voting: 5 ⭐ ( 35882 reviews)
Summary: Post-Acute Quality Initiatives: The Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation (CARE) Item Set Post-Acute Care Payment Reform Demonstration:
Match with the search results: The WHO Hospital Care assessment tools were found to be more comprehensive in their ability to capture the WHO Standards. These tools were first developed in ……. read more
7. Quality assessment program in primary care clinics: a tool for quality improvement
Author: www.ihi.org
Date Submitted: 04/14/2020 02:12 PM
Average star voting: 3 ⭐ ( 66270 reviews)
Summary: Abstract. Background. Assessment of quality of health care is a major ongoing project of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) medical corps.Objectives. (i) To descr
Match with the search results: Tools include FMEA, SBAR, root cause analysis, daily huddles, and more. Quality Improvement Essentials Toolkit. Download these ten essential quality improvement ……. read more
8. CDC Levels of Care Assessment Tool (CDC LOCATe) | CDC
Author: openmd.com
Date Submitted: 12/26/2019 12:28 AM
Average star voting: 5 ⭐ ( 67047 reviews)
Summary: Perinatal quality collaboratives (PQCs) are state or multi-state networks of teams working to improve health outcomes for mothers and babies.
Match with the search results: Health Information Quality Assessment Tools · JAMA Benchmarks (Silberg Standards), 1997 · Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose ( ……. read more
9. Quality Assessment and Improvement Resources – HSE.ie
Author: www.researchgate.net
Date Submitted: 11/05/2020 06:12 AM
Average star voting: 5 ⭐ ( 39387 reviews)
Summary: Quality Assessment and Improvement Tool PDFs
Match with the search results: In a first step a systematic assessment of quality of primary care was carried out in all health facilities within a given council, using the “electronic Tool ……. read more
10. Measuring quality of care for all women and newborns: how do we know if we are doing it right? A review of facility assessment tools
Author: bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com
Date Submitted: 04/16/2020 03:40 AM
Average star voting: 3 ⭐ ( 33664 reviews)
Summary:
Match with the search results: The new WHO integrated tool in principle, enables an assessment of the quality of care provided against national standards (accepted and ……. read more
11. Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools – World
Author: www.jhsph.edu
Date Submitted: 10/28/2022 03:45 PM
Average star voting: 3 ⭐ ( 99358 reviews)
Summary: Analysis in English on World about Health and Epidemic; published on 4 Oct 2021 by BMJ
Match with the search results: . They also cover a variety of modes of providing care, including history, physical examination, laboratory study, medication, and other interventions and contacts….. read more
